<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phew &#8211; for now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/2008/12/19/phew-for-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/2008/12/19/phew-for-now/</link>
	<description>The greatest writers on the world of cars from the BBC&#039;s Top Gear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:04:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/2008/12/19/phew-for-now/#comment-3457</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/?p=331#comment-3457</guid>
		<description>save ford and gm.

but from chrysler keep dodge-only the viper and challenger-and keep jeep but screw the rest the rest all suck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>save ford and gm.</p>
<p>but from chrysler keep dodge-only the viper and challenger-and keep jeep but screw the rest the rest all suck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJB</title>
		<link>http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/2008/12/19/phew-for-now/#comment-2154</link>
		<dc:creator>LJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/?p=331#comment-2154</guid>
		<description>Excellent!

Here goes the US government borrowing money that was printed out of thin air by the fed to support corporations that screwed themselves over and cannot be fixed with any amount money. With the ridiculous inflation and worsened debt that will surely result from this, the economy is really on its way to recovery!

But with all sarcasm aside, I wish people wouldn&#039;t be so blind. All these bailouts will do in the long run is increase the burden of debt on the American taxpayer, while they cause a ridiculous increase in the money supply. Remember what printing money without restraint did before the Great Depression? History is bound to repeat itself if society refuses to learn the mistakes of the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent!</p>
<p>Here goes the US government borrowing money that was printed out of thin air by the fed to support corporations that screwed themselves over and cannot be fixed with any amount money. With the ridiculous inflation and worsened debt that will surely result from this, the economy is really on its way to recovery!</p>
<p>But with all sarcasm aside, I wish people wouldn&#8217;t be so blind. All these bailouts will do in the long run is increase the burden of debt on the American taxpayer, while they cause a ridiculous increase in the money supply. Remember what printing money without restraint did before the Great Depression? History is bound to repeat itself if society refuses to learn the mistakes of the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Stevens</title>
		<link>http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/2008/12/19/phew-for-now/#comment-1915</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/?p=331#comment-1915</guid>
		<description>Methane isn&#039;t dense or power rich enough to be a viable alternative to petrol. Hydrogen is the fuel of the future once a few things (not exactly minor things, I&#039;ll admit) are sorted out. Until then the volt concept is very interesting, it&#039;s far more efficient to design an engine to do just one thing well, I think it will be remembered as a real eureka moment in car design. Like many great leaps forward it hasn&#039;t really invented or discovered anything, it has just looked at the things we know and taken them to a logical conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Methane isn&#8217;t dense or power rich enough to be a viable alternative to petrol. Hydrogen is the fuel of the future once a few things (not exactly minor things, I&#8217;ll admit) are sorted out. Until then the volt concept is very interesting, it&#8217;s far more efficient to design an engine to do just one thing well, I think it will be remembered as a real eureka moment in car design. Like many great leaps forward it hasn&#8217;t really invented or discovered anything, it has just looked at the things we know and taken them to a logical conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris of Melbourne</title>
		<link>http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/2008/12/19/phew-for-now/#comment-1705</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris of Melbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/?p=331#comment-1705</guid>
		<description>Dear Team,

I&#039;ve looked through the blog and I think a longer perspective is needed not only of economic history (it really is cyclic) but also the future of the car industry.

Given the US has been in a recession for a year, a recovery will be overdue around July 2009. I have no doubt the push to replace older technology - and that includes fossil-fueled vehicles - coupled with traditional government &#039;pump-priming&#039; spending and a miniscule cost of borrowing will turn things around. In short, we need to get over the fear and start to look for positive signals (for example, a slowing of the decline in house prices or reductions in household debt).

As for Top Gear, it is a great program but I would like to see the crew investigate more alternative fuels. I find it incongruous given the UK has so much coal and natural gas, as to why British cars are not fueled with methane gas. I know this was done during World War II. I can&#039;t see why it would be too difficult technically since many vehicle already use liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Team,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve looked through the blog and I think a longer perspective is needed not only of economic history (it really is cyclic) but also the future of the car industry.</p>
<p>Given the US has been in a recession for a year, a recovery will be overdue around July 2009. I have no doubt the push to replace older technology &#8211; and that includes fossil-fueled vehicles &#8211; coupled with traditional government &#8216;pump-priming&#8217; spending and a miniscule cost of borrowing will turn things around. In short, we need to get over the fear and start to look for positive signals (for example, a slowing of the decline in house prices or reductions in household debt).</p>
<p>As for Top Gear, it is a great program but I would like to see the crew investigate more alternative fuels. I find it incongruous given the UK has so much coal and natural gas, as to why British cars are not fueled with methane gas. I know this was done during World War II. I can&#8217;t see why it would be too difficult technically since many vehicle already use liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TOYBOY</title>
		<link>http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/2008/12/19/phew-for-now/#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>TOYBOY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/?p=331#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>Pls try and get to show the toyota V12 Nardo on the show</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pls try and get to show the toyota V12 Nardo on the show</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: English Cad</title>
		<link>http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/2008/12/19/phew-for-now/#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>English Cad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/?p=331#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>Paul your posts are always of great interest and informative, just trying to goad you into replying. There that&#039;s enough toadying, can Cad get back to what he does best, being puerile and ignorant something you will agree Cad is rather good at. Paul have a brilliant New Year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul your posts are always of great interest and informative, just trying to goad you into replying. There that&#8217;s enough toadying, can Cad get back to what he does best, being puerile and ignorant something you will agree Cad is rather good at. Paul have a brilliant New Year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmac1969</title>
		<link>http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/2008/12/19/phew-for-now/#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmac1969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/?p=331#comment-1691</guid>
		<description>Why doesnt Ford USA sell the newest Focus? IIRC they still sell the Mk1 out there...They should sell the newest one , and also the new Fiesta and Mondeo. Gm should have the new Corsa and Insignia availible in the USA too , I cant suggest anything to save Chrysler though. Its cheaper to run a small turbo diesel engined car than one of those big petrol 4x4s , in dark economic times they are the kind of cars the American public may think about buying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesnt Ford USA sell the newest Focus? IIRC they still sell the Mk1 out there&#8230;They should sell the newest one , and also the new Fiesta and Mondeo. Gm should have the new Corsa and Insignia availible in the USA too , I cant suggest anything to save Chrysler though. Its cheaper to run a small turbo diesel engined car than one of those big petrol 4&#215;4s , in dark economic times they are the kind of cars the American public may think about buying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Horrell</title>
		<link>http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/2008/12/19/phew-for-now/#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Horrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/?p=331#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>OK English Cad (67), just to prove we&#039;re not all asleep at the wheel, here are some facts.

1. The licence fee doesn&#039;t pay for this blog, as it&#039;s part of the BBC&#039;s external commercial arm. In fact Top Gear magazine and topgear.com actually make a profit which subsidises the licence fee.

2. I don&#039;t work for the BBC anyway, I&#039;m a freelance, paid by topgear.com to do this blog because their editors think I do a decent job of it. (You&#039;re welcome to disagree, though I notice you keep coming back so you must find something to commend it, and I&#039;ll take that graciously.) But yes, I&#039;ve had a few days off for Christmas.

3. I try not to comment too much on the replies posted here. It&#039;s generally better to let the debate rage. The comments by the way are unmoderated, which explains why so many of them drift off topic, and why so many show appalling spelling and grasp of the English language. I&#039;m assuming lots of people are posting in what is not their first language, so it would be unfair and unkind unkind to poke fun at them.

Cheers, and happy 2009 yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK English Cad (67), just to prove we&#8217;re not all asleep at the wheel, here are some facts.</p>
<p>1. The licence fee doesn&#8217;t pay for this blog, as it&#8217;s part of the BBC&#8217;s external commercial arm. In fact Top Gear magazine and topgear.com actually make a profit which subsidises the licence fee.</p>
<p>2. I don&#8217;t work for the BBC anyway, I&#8217;m a freelance, paid by topgear.com to do this blog because their editors think I do a decent job of it. (You&#8217;re welcome to disagree, though I notice you keep coming back so you must find something to commend it, and I&#8217;ll take that graciously.) But yes, I&#8217;ve had a few days off for Christmas.</p>
<p>3. I try not to comment too much on the replies posted here. It&#8217;s generally better to let the debate rage. The comments by the way are unmoderated, which explains why so many of them drift off topic, and why so many show appalling spelling and grasp of the English language. I&#8217;m assuming lots of people are posting in what is not their first language, so it would be unfair and unkind unkind to poke fun at them.</p>
<p>Cheers, and happy 2009 yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: English Cad</title>
		<link>http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/2008/12/19/phew-for-now/#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>English Cad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/?p=331#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>PS if things get any worse next year Cad would like to propose the following cut backs at Top Gear...Star on a reasonably priced push bike. Tom Ford (Clarkson mini me)permanently left at 5th gear to entertain their 7 remaining viewers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS if things get any worse next year Cad would like to propose the following cut backs at Top Gear&#8230;Star on a reasonably priced push bike. Tom Ford (Clarkson mini me)permanently left at 5th gear to entertain their 7 remaining viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: English Cad</title>
		<link>http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/2008/12/19/phew-for-now/#comment-1685</link>
		<dc:creator>English Cad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreman.blogs.topgear.com/?p=331#comment-1685</guid>
		<description>Everyone&#039;s gone off on a tangent with this blog. Mind you, can&#039;t see any of the top gear team rushing to do a new blog, aren&#039;t licence payers a wonderful thing?
Happy New Year Top Gear team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone&#8217;s gone off on a tangent with this blog. Mind you, can&#8217;t see any of the top gear team rushing to do a new blog, aren&#8217;t licence payers a wonderful thing?<br />
Happy New Year Top Gear team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
